Coker v. Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. et al
Jake Coker |
Greg Radding, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo and Gerry Gordon |
3:2020cv03071 |
August 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
Mary Geiger Lewis |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1446 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 REPLY to Response to Motion re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo, Gerry Gordon, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., Greg Radding. (Macaulay, Angus) |
Filing 28 RESPONSE in Opposition re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Response filed by Jake Coker.Reply to Response to Motion due by 10/22/2020 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Goodwyn, Thomas) |
Filing 27 TEXT ORDER granting #26 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM. (Response to Motion due by 10/15/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 10/7/2020.(cbru, ) |
Filing 26 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Jake Coker. Response to Motion due by 10/21/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Goodwyn, Thomas) Modified to link correct event to associated event on 10/7/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 25 TEXT ORDER granting #12 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #13 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/24/2020.(cbru, ) |
Filing 23 Deficiency Notification (Prior notifications sent via e-mail) In Re Document Number:12, 13. Docket Correction due 9/24/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 22 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Greg Radding.(Macaulay, Angus) |
Filing 21 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jim Morin.(Macaulay, Angus) |
Filing 20 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Gerry Gordon.(Macaulay, Angus) |
Filing 19 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Phil DeFronzo.(Macaulay, Angus) |
Filing 18 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Russell Baboff.(Macaulay, Angus) |
Filing 16 CLERK'S NOTICE: Defendants Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo, Gerry Gordon, Jim Morin, and Greg Radding are reminded that Answers to Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are to be filed at the time a party first appears. Please file these answers to interrogatories no later than October 6, 2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 15 Additional Attachments to Main Document #14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM . First attachment description: Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Defendants Motion to Dismiss . (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Matthew S.L. Cate)(Willis, Marguerite) |
Filing 14 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo, Gerry Gordon, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., Greg Radding. Response to Motion due by 10/5/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Memo in Support, #2 Exhibit 1 - Branch Management Agreement - 2017, #3 Exhibit 2 - Retail Plus Branch Manager Agreement, #4 Exhibit 3 - NMLS - Texas, Jacob Coker, #5 Exhibit 4 - SML Notice of Intent to Revoke, #6 Exhibit 5 - SML Closing Letter, #7 Exhibit 6 - California DBO Accusation vs Jacob Coker)No proposed order.(Willis, Marguerite) Additional attachment filed as entry #15 on 9/21/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Constantinos G. Panagopoulos ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-9349378) by Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo, Gerry Gordon, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., Greg Radding. Response to Motion due by 10/1/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit /Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.(Macaulay, Angus) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/24/2020) (cbru, ). |
Filing 12 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Matthew Stephen Lee Cate ( Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 0420-9349314) by Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo, Gerry Gordon, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., Greg Radding. Response to Motion due by 10/1/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit /Application for Pro Hac Vice Admission, #2 Certificate of Good Standing)No proposed order.(Macaulay, Angus) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/24/2020) (cbru, ). |
Filing 11 ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF COMPLAINT by Jake Coker. Russell Baboff served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020; Phil DeFronzo served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020; Gerry Gordon served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020; Jim Morin served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020; Greg Radding served on 9/8/2020, answer due 9/29/2020. (Goodwyn, Thomas) (Main Document 11 replaced on 9/10/2020) (cbru, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/10/2020: #1 Signed Acceptance) (cbru, ). |
Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Jake Coker.(Goodwyn, Thomas) Modified to edit text on 9/2/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer; granting #7 Motion to Consolidate Response Deadlines. (Russell Baboff answer due 9/21/2020; Phil DeFronzo answer due 9/21/2020; Gerry Gordon answer due 9/21/2020; Jim Morin answer due 9/21/2020; Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. answer due 9/21/2020; Greg Radding answer due 9/21/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 9/2/2020.(cbru, ) |
Filing 8 REPLY by Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. To Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis. (Willis, Marguerite) |
Filing 7 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer, MOTION to Consolidate Response Deadlines by Russell Baboff, Phil DeFronzo, Gerry Gordon, Jim Morin, Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., Greg Radding. Response to Motion due by 9/16/2020. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. No proposed order.(Willis, Marguerite). Modified to add motion relief and to edit text on 9/2/2020 (cbru, ). |
Filing 5 TEXT ORDER: The parties' attention is directed to the Court's Standing Order Regarding All Removed Cases Assigned to Judge Mary Geiger Lewis, located on the District Court's website at https://www.scd.uscourts.gov/Forms/Special_Instructions/Lewis_Standing%20_Order_Regarding_Removed_Cases.pdf. Not later than seven days from the entry of this Text Order, Defendant(s) shall file the information mandated by the Order. IT IS SO ORDERED. (Reply due by 9/3/2020) Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 8/27/2020. (cbru, ) |
Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Norwich Commercial Group, Inc.(cbru, ) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Norwich Commercial Group, Inc.(cbru, ) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Richland County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2020-CP-40-03353 (Filing fee $400 receipt number 0420-9303351) filed by Norwich Commercial Group, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Summons and Complaint, #2 Exhibit 2 - Certificate of Service - Norwich Commercial Group, Inc., #3 Exhibit 3 - Consent to Removal by Individual Defendants, #4 Exhibit 4 - Notice to State Court of Removal)(cbru, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.