Barnes v. Quattlebaum et al
| Steven Louis Barnes |
| E Quattlebaum, Major Jackson and South Carolina Department of Corrections |
| 4:2008cv02197 |
| June 12, 2008 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Prison:Prison Condition Office |
| Dorchester |
| Thomas E Rogers |
| Margaret B Seymour |
| None |
| Federal Question |
| 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of Magistrate Judge Rogers. Plaintiff's motion for preliminary injunction (Entry 39) is denied. Defendant's motion for summary judgment (Entry 40) is granted without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. All remaining motions are denied as moot. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 09/28/2009. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Court adopts 9 Report and Recommendation, denies 2 Motion for TRO filed by Steven Louis Barnes and denies as moot 16 Motion for Extension of Time, filed by Steven Louis Barnes, 17 Motion for Extensio n of Time, filed by Steven Louis Barnes, 18 Motion for Reconsideration, filed by Steven Louis Barnes, 15 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply, filed by Steven Louis Barnes. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 3/12/09. (swel, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
