Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Steven Barnes v. E. Quattlebaum et al
as 09-8101
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LEWIS BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
E. QUATTLEBAUM, Sergeant, individually and official capacity, MAJOR JACKSON, individually and official capacity and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Steven Barnes v. E. Quattlebaum
as 09-6619
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LEWIS BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
E. QUATTLEBAUM, Sergeant, individually and official capacity, MAJOR JACKSON, individually and official capacity and SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Singletary v McKie et al
as 8:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Singletary
Defendant:
Bernard McKie, E Quattlebaum and H Boatman
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-8228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Defendant - None:
AMERICAN AMENITIES INCORPORATED, Distributor of toothpaste and deoderant
Barnes v. Quattlebaum et al
as 4:2008cv02197
Plaintiff:
Steven Louis Barnes
Defendant:
E Quattlebaum, Major Jackson and South Carolina Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6952
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Christopher Williams v. Jon Ozmint
as 08-6186
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER LOVE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JON OZMINT, SCDC Director, ROBERT WARD, Division Director, DAVID M. TATARSKY, General Counsel and others
Williams v. Ozmint et al
as 6:2007cv02409
Plaintiff:
Christopher Love Williams
Defendant:
Jon Ozmint, Robert Ward, David Tatarsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
