Rodriguez v. People of the State of California, The
Petitioner: Rolando Rodriguez
Respondent: People of the State of California, The
Case Number: 4:2010cv01449
Filed: June 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Office: Florence Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: David C Norton
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 20, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R 22 as the Order of this Court and it is ORDERED that the petition be dismissed without prejudice and without issuance and service of process. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 10/20/2010. (dsto, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. People of the State of California, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Rolando Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: People of the State of California, The
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?