Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Swearingen et al v. RGR Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Nichole Hebert Swearingen, Stephen Kyle Swearingen and individually and on behalf of their minor child, CS
Defendant:
RGR Transport, Inc., Rolando Rodriguez and Falls Lake National Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodriguez v. Jenkins
as 1:2023cv03228
Petitioner:
Rolando Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Sylvester Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Green v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
Jaron Green
Defendant:
CITY OF CHICAGO, Patrick McDonagh, Patrick Deenihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lollis et al v. Cenovus Energy Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Levi Lollis Jr., David Cook and Rolando Rodriguez
Defendant:
Cenovus Energy Inc., John Does and Lima Refining Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Rodriguez
as 22-10837
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rolando Rodriguez
United States v. Rolando Rodriguez-Valdovinos
as 22-2685
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Rolando Rodriguez-Valdovinos
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11477
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv04627
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO RODRIGUEZ and ASHLEY RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv65552
Plaintiff:
ROLANDO RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dukes v. Washburn et al
as 1:2021cv03672
Plaintiff:
William Dukes
Defendant:
James Washburn, Rolando Rodriguez, Darlene Sobczak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
