Smith v. Riffle et al
||Riffle, R. Goodman, Dr. Hoey, L. Cross, Wright, Gio Ramirez, Southeast Regional Director, Thomas Kane and U.S. Department of Justice
||September 18, 2017
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||Margaret B Seymour
||Thomas E Rogers
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 13, 2018
JUDGMENT by the clerk. This case is dismissed pursuant to Rule 41(b) with prejudice for failure to prosecute. (dsto, )
|November 15, 2017
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court concurs in the Report and Recommendation 13 and incorporates it herein by reference. Plaintiff's complaint is summarily dismissed without prejudice and without issuan ce and service of process as to Defendants Southeast Regional Director, Kane, and the United States Department of Justice only. The case is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for further pretrial handling.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Margaret B Seymour on 11/15/2017. (dsto, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?