United States of America v. Kratom Powder et al
| United States of America |
| Kratom Capsules, Count Kratom Capsules, All Other Quantities, Bulk Kratom Powder, Bulk Kratom Capsules and Kratom Powder |
| 4:2018cv02981 |
| November 5, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| R Bryan Harwell |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SERVICE by Publication filed by United States of America. Last publication date 12/13/18. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Advertisement)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Judicial Forfeiture Action by United States of America (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 5 WARRANT Returned Executed as to 48,877 bags, more or less, of kratom powder in 30 gram, 100 gram, and 250 gram configurations labeled in part: Earth Kratom... Supplement Facts... Distributed by Fire Wholesale, etc.. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents Warrant Return)(Sherard, Carrie) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT FOR ARREST IN REM ISSUED. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION FOR WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM by United States of America. (lsut, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Other Quantities, Bulk Kratom Capsules, Bulk Kratom Powder, Count Kratom Capsules, Kratom Capsules, Kratom Powder, filed by United States of America. Service due by 2/4/2019. (Attachments: #1 Verification) (lsut, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
