Cases
United States of America v. 250,000 filled bottles of liquid product et al
as 4:2023cv00168
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 250,000 filled bottles of liquid product, 1.5 tanks of liquid product, 1,200 cartons of capsules and others
Claimant: Botanic Tonics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1341 Complaint for Forfeiture
United States of America v. Kratom Powder et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv02981
Defendant: Kratom Capsules, Count Kratom Capsules, All Other Quantities and others
Plaintiff: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
United States of America v. 101 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bottles and Pouches of Articles of Drug Labeled in Part as Kratom Therapy Mitragyna Speciosa, et al
as 2:2016cv05138
Defendant: 101 Cases, More or Less, Containing Bottles and Pouches of Articles of Drug Labeled in Part as Kratom Therapy (Mitragyna Speciosa) and All Other Quantities of the Above Articles of Drug that are Located Anywhere on the Premises of Nature Therapeutics LLC, dba Kratom Therapy, 953 Huber St., Grover Beach, California
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. 577 Cartons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06729
Defendant: 577 Cartons and All Other Quantities of the Above Article of Drug
Plaintiff: United States of America
United States of America v. 1,149 Four ounce round metal tins, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part et al
as 4:2012cv00362
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: 1,149 Four ounce round metal tins, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part, 244 Two ounce round metal tins, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part, 316 One third fluid ounce glass bottles, more or less, of an article of drug, labeled in part and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 332

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?