Metzgar v. Target Corporation
| Lauren Metzgar |
| Target Corporation |
| 4:2023cv01708 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Joseph Dawson |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 6/7/2023. (lgib, ) |
| Filing 9 TEXT ORDER granting #8 Motion for Confidentiality Order. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 6/7/2023. (lgib, ) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Confidentiality Order by Target Corporation. Response to Motion due by 6/20/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Proposed order is being emailed to chambers with copy to opposing counsel.(Brown, Grace) |
| Filing 7 CONSENT AMENDED CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 8/31/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 10/21/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 11/21/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/21/2023, Discovery due by 1/20/2024, Motions due by 2/20/2024, Jury Selection Deadline 5/20/2024, Mediation Due by 1/20/2024. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 5/10/2023. (lgib, ) |
| Filing 6 Joint Rule 26(f) Report by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Proposed Amended Conference and Scheduling Order)(Brown, Grace) |
| Filing 5 CONFERENCE AND SCHEDULING ORDER. Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 5/17/2023, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 5/31/2023, Rule 26 Report due by 5/31/2023, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 6/21/2023, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 7/21/2023, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 8/21/2023, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 8/21/2023, Discovery due by 10/20/2023, Motions due by 11/20/2023, Jury Selection Deadline 2/20/2024, Mediation Due by 10/20/2023. Signed by the Honorable Joseph Dawson, III on 4/26/2023. (lgib, ) |
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) by Target Corporation. (lgib, ) (Main Document 4 replaced on 4/26/2023 to correct main document) (lgib, ). |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Target Corporation. (lgib, ) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Horry County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2023-CP-26-01409 (filing fee $402 receipt number ASCDC-11066040), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents) (lgib, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Metzgar v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Lauren Metzgar | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Stanley Sandefur |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Mark Steven Barrow |
| Represented By: | Grace Gardner Brown |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
