Drummond v. Spartanburg County et al
| Edward Drummond |
| Spartanburg County, Neal Urch, Virginia DuPont, Asley McCann, Sgt Thomas, Dr Bonobo, Nurse White and Dr McDonalds |
| 5:2015cv04285 |
| October 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Kaymani D West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
194
AMENDED ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re ECF No. 191 Order Ruling on Report and Recommendation: ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 185 ) to the extent it does not contradict this Order, and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Defendant McDonald's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 68 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claims, the other Defendants' motion for summar y judgment (ECF No. 150 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claims, Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 169 ) is DENIED, Plaintiff's motion for a third-party doctor examination (ECF No. 184 ) is DENIED, Plaintiff&# 039;s federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and his state claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so he can pursue them in state court if he wishes to do so. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 2/6/2017. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
191
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 185 ) to the extent it does not contradict this Order, and incorporates it herein. Accordingly, Defendant McDonald's moti on for summary judgment (ECF No. 68 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claims, the other Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 150 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's federal claims, Plaintiff's motion for summary judg ment (ECF No. 169 ) is DENIED, Plaintiff's motion for a third-party doctor examination (ECF No. 184 ) is DENIED, Plaintiff's federal claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and his state claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so he can pursue them in state court if he wishes to do so. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/25/2017. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
147
ORDER denying 88 Motion to Strike; 93 Motion for Full Medical Report, Full Discovery, and Full Interrogatories; 126 Motion for Copy of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), Motion to Produce; 101 Motion for S anctions; 108 Motion for Conspiracy, Special Verdict, and Liability of Multiple Defendants; 119 Motion to Amend due to Extraordinary Circumstances of the Powerful Drug "Seroquel"; 109 Motion to Protect and/or Seal Whistle Blower; 118 Motion for Mediation, Motion to File Documents under Seal; 129 Motion to Appoint Counsel; and granting 112 Motion for issuance of Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/1/2016. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 72 Motion for a $1 Million Liability Cap; denying 78 Motion for Discovery; denying 79 Motion to Compel; denying 83 Motion to Amend/Correct; granting 83 Motion for Extension of Time; denying 83 Motion for Issuance of Subpoena; granting in part and denying in part 86 Motion for Punitive Damages and Against a Municipality. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 5/23/2016. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections, adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22), and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court that the Co mplaint against Spartanburg County and Dr. Bonobo is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in its entirety; and Claims One, Two, and Four are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE against all Defendants. In Plaintiff's objections and supplemental objections, he spe cifically asks to amend his complaint. He also adds new allegations, wherein he appears to be attempting to amend his complaint constructively. The Court will allow the Magistrate Judge to consider whether to allow those amendments in the first instance. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 4/21/2016. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
