Drummond v. Spartanburg County Jail et al
| Edward Drummond |
| Spartanburg County Jail, Sargent Blackwell, Neal Urch, Asley McCann, Det Brock and Det Reyes |
| 5:2015cv04713 |
| November 19, 2015 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Mary Geiger Lewis |
| Kaymani D West |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
154
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court overrules Plaintiff's objections, adopts the Report 148 , and incorporates it herein.Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court Defendants' Amended Motion for Su mmary Judgment 138 is GRANTED, Plaintiff's state claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE so Plaintiff can bring those claims in state court if he wishes to do so, and Plaintiff's motions for summary judgment 121 , 142 are DENIED. Consequently, Plaintiff's motion concerning medical records is RENDERED MOOT.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 07/11/2017. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 116 ), and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of this Court Defendants' motion for summary judgment (E CF No. 93 ) is GRANTED as to Plaintiff's claims for denial of access to courts and medical indifference, and DENIED as to Plaintiff's claims related to due process; and Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 115 ) is DENIE D.As per the Magistrate Judge's suggestion Defendants shall be provided an opportunity to submit additional briefing concerning Plaintiff's housing/classification and conditions of confinement claims in light of Dilworth. The Court will leave the briefing schedule of these matters to the sound discretion of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 1/25/2017. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
90
ORDER denying 53 Motion to Protect and/or Seal Whistle Blower; 59 Motion for Mediation, Motion to File Documents under Seal; 65 Motion to Appoint Counsel and granting 54 , 81 Motions for Issuance of Subpoena. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/1/2016. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER: The undersigned grants Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, ECF No. 44 ; grants in part (as to claim for punitive damages) and denies in part Plaintiff's Motion to Amend, ECF No. 47 ; denies Motion to Amend, ECF No.[ 55]; and denies Motion to Amend, ECF No. 60 . The undersigned denies Plaintiff's Motion for Conspiracy and Special Verdict, ECF No. 52 . The Clerk is instructed to docket ECF No. 44 as a supplemental pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint. Up on attachment by the Clerk, Defendants may answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Supplemental Pleadings in accordance with Rule 15(a)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants' time to respond will begin and service will b e effected when the Clerk dockets the supplemental pleading.Plaintiff is hereby advised that the time to amend his Complaint is over, and the court will not consider any other Motions to Amend absent truly extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 06/24/2016.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing
84
ORDER: Plaintiff's action against Defendant McDonald is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Mary Geiger Lewis on 6/23/2016. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
