Pronin v. Wright et al
| Dmitry Pronin |
| Charles Wright, Neal Urch, Ashley McCann and L. Blackwell |
| 5:2016cv03635 |
| November 15, 2016 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Orangeburg Office |
| Spartanburg |
| Kaymani D West |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
201
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts the 193 Report and Recommendation and incorporates it herein. It is thereforeORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment, docket number 174 , is granted. It is further ORDERED that Pronin's motion to protect from court appearances, docket number 200 , is dismissed as moot. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 5/13/2019. (prou, )
|
|
Filing
178
ORDER denying without prejudice 173 Renewed Verified Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 10/05/2018.(dsto, )
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER FOR DISBURSEMENT re 71 USCA Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kaymani D West on 7/12/2017. (mcot, )
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The court adopts the magistrate judge's Report and Recommendation 27 to the extent it is consistent with this order.It is therefore ORDERED that Pronin's complaint as to M cCann is dismissed without prejudice. It is further ORDERED that Pronin file an amended complaint within 15 days of this order. It is further ORDERED that Pronin's motion for certification of a class action, docket number 22 , is denied. It is further ORDERED that this case is remanded to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 04/03/2017. (dsto, )
|
|
Filing
1
ORDER directing claims of two Plaintiffs in action 5:16-cv-02924-HMH-KDW be separated for initial review. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on 11/15/2016. (mcot, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
