Goodman v. Wade et al
| Nancy Goodman |
| James Allen Wade and Estes Express Lines |
| Auto-Owners Insurance Company |
| 7:2021cv02300 |
| July 26, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 22 CONSENT AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 12/20/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 1/18/2022, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 2/18/2022, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 2/18/2022, Discovery due by 3/21/2022, Mediation Due by 3/28/2022, Motions due by 4/4/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 6/6/2022 or sixty (60) days after dispositive motions have been resolved. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 9/10/21. (kmca) |
| Filing 21 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Estes Express Lines, James Allen Wade.(Rozelsky, Kurt) |
| Filing 20 Local Rule 26.03 Answers to Interrogatories by Nancy Goodman.(Bouton, William) |
| Filing 19 Joint Rule 26(f) Report and Joint ADR Statement/Certification by Nancy Goodman, James Allen Wade, Estes Express Lines, Auto-Owners Insurance Company.(Bouton, William) Modified on 9/10/2021: to add joint filers as listed, to add text (ADR) (kmca). |
| Filing 17 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Auto-Owners Insurance Company.(Clark, Thomas) |
| Filing 16 Conditional ANSWER to Complaint and Notice of Appearance by Auto-Owners Insurance Company.(Clark, Thomas) |
| Filing 15 DELETION OF DOCKET ENTRY NUMBER #13 Acceptance of Service. Reason: re-filed by attorney to correct event and add signed notice of filing. Corrected Filing Document Number #14 Summons Returned Executed. (kmca) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nancy Goodman. UIM Carrier Auto-Owners Insurance Company served on 8/9/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit acceptance of service)(Bouton, William) Modified on 8/16/2021: to add text (service and answer dates) (kmca). |
| Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER. Mediation Due by 1/26/2022. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 8/6/21. (kmca) |
Filing 11
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26(f) Conference Deadline 8/26/2021, 26(a) Initial Disclosures due by 9/9/2021, ADR Statement/Certification due by 9/9/2021, Rule 26 Report due by 9/9/2021, Motions to Amend Pleadings due by 10/20/2021, Plaintiffs ID of Expert Witness due by 11/19/2021, Defendants ID of Expert Witnesses Due by 12/20/2021, Records Custodian Affidavit due by 12/20/2021, Discovery due by 1/19/2022, Motions due by 2/2/2022, Jury Selection Deadline 4/4/2022 or sixty (60) days after dispositive motions have been resolved. Signed by Honorable Timothy M Cain on 8/6/21. (kmca)
|
| Filing 10 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Nancy Goodman.(Bouton, William) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to Complaint by Estes Express Lines, James Allen Wade.(Rozelsky, Kurt) |
| Filing 6 CLERK'S NOTICE: Plaintiff's Local Rule 26.01 Interrogatories are due fourteen (14) days after removal. (kmca) |
| Filing 4 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT PURSUANT TO FRCP 7.1 by Estes Express Lines.(kmca) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by Estes Express Lines, James Allen Wade.(kmca) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Spartanburg County Court of Common Pleas, case number 2021-CP-42-01939. (Filing fee $402 receipt number 0420-9980291), filed by Estes Express Lines, James Allen Wade. (Attachments: #1 State Court Documents)(kmca) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
