Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Kupferberg et al v. American Airlines Group Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01220
Plaintiff:
Jill A. Kupferberg and Nancy Goodman
Defendant:
American Airlines Group Inc. and Jetblue Airways Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Goodman v. Wade et al
as 7:2021cv02300
Plaintiff:
Nancy Goodman
Defendant:
James Allen Wade and Estes Express Lines
Not Classified By Court:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders v. Sennholz et al
as 2:2017cv10578
Plaintiff:
Jerroll Sanders
Defendant:
Kelly Sennholz , Kirstin Elaine Martin , Diane Blumstein and others
In re: Blumstein
as 17-1029
Petitioner:
DIANE BLUMSTEIN, NANCY GOODMAN and DONNA
Respondent:
JOSEPH A. BIDEN, President of the United States Senate (114th Congress), MEMBERS OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES (114TH CONGRESS), MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES SENATE (114TH CONGRESS) and others
Goodman et al v. J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00414
Plaintiff:
Nancy Goodman and Jacqueline Peiffer
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Investment Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kevin Davis v. Hayes, et al
as 11-17716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SCOTT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HAYES, Dr., HILLER, Dr., TROUGH, Dr. and others
Francis Pullano v. CCDC Guard, et al
as 11-16809
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANCIS J. PULLANO
Defendant - Appellee:
CCDC GUARD, # 8170, ARB, CCDC Guard, MARY BRAMMER, NaphCare Nurse and others
Kevin Davis v. Hayes, et al
as 11-15443
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN SCOTT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
HAYES, Dr., HILLER, Dr., TROUGH, Dr. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00775
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pullano v Clark County Detention et al
as 2:2010cv00335
Defendant:
Arb, Mary Brammer, CCDC Employees and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
