Foster v. McMaster et al
| Robert Lee Foster |
| Henry McMaster, Alan Wilson, Bryan Stirling, Larry W Powell, Tony Fisher and Spartanburg Harold Journey Newspaper |
| Chuck Wright |
| 7:2021cv02910 |
| September 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Timothy M Cain |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 DECLARATION by Robert Lee Foster. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(cpeg, ) |
| Filing 13 OBJECTION to #9 Report and Recommendation by Robert Lee Foster. Reply to Objections due by 10/21/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. (Attachments: #1 Supporting Documents, #2 Envelope)(cpeg, ) |
| Filing 11 Letter from Robert Lee Foster. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cpeg, ) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #8 Order, #9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) filed by Robert Lee Foster, #1 Complaint filed by Robert Lee Foster placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Robert Lee Foster 194085 Livesay Correctional Institution PO Box 580 Una, SC 29378 (cpeg, ) |
| Filing 9 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Molly H. Cherry. It is recommended that Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed IFP (ECF No. #2 ) be DENIED. It is further recommended that the Court give Plaintiff fourteen days from the date the United States District Judge rules on this Report and Recommendation (or a specific date determined by the United States District Judge) to pay the full $402 filing fee ($350 filing fee plus $52 administrative fee), in which event this matter can be returned to the undersigned magistrate judge to conduct a review of Plaintiffs Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915A. Objections to R&R due by 10/12/2021 Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 09/27/2021. (cpeg, ) |
Filing 8
ORDER: You are ordered to always keep the Clerk of Court advised in writing (Post Office Box 835, Charleston, South Carolina 29402) if your address changes for any reason, so as to assure that orders or other matters that specify deadlines for you to meet will be received by you. If as a result of your failure to comply with this Order, you fail to meet a deadline set by this court, your case may be dismissed for violating this Order. Therefore, if you have a change of address before this case is ended, you must comply with this Order by immediately advising the Clerk of Court in writing of such change of address and providing the court with the docket number of all pending cases you have filed with this court. Your failure to do so will not be excused by the court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Molly H Cherry on 09/27/2021. (cpeg, )
|
| Filing 3 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: Spartanburg. (hcor, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Robert Lee Foster. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope)Motions referred to Molly H Cherry.(hcor, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tony Fisher, Henry McMaster, Larry W Powell, Spartanburg Harold Journey Newspaper, Bryan Stirling, Alan Wilson, Chuck Wright, filed by Robert Lee Foster. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope)(hcor, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
