Riley v. Lexington et al
| Anthony Riley |
| County Of Lexington and Lexington County Food Service Providers |
| 8:2010cv01315 |
| May 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Anderson/Greenwood Office |
| Lexington |
| Henry M Herlong |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
OPINION AND ORDER RULING ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 39 , DENYING 37 Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Prosecution filed by Trinity Food Service. Trinity Food Service is ordered to serve its motion to dismiss or in the alternative summary judgment on Plaintiff. Signed by Honorable Henry M Herlong, Jr on November 16, 2010. (ncha, )
|
|
Filing
39
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: It is recommended that the 2 Complaint be dismissed with prejudice for lack of prosecution for failure to comply with the Court's orders. If the District Court adopts this report, it is recommended that the 29 MO TION for Summary Judgment filed by James Metts, 37 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution filed by Trinity Food Service, and 32 MOTION to Dismiss or in the alternative summary judgment filed by Trinity Food Service be denied as moot. Objections to R&R due by 11/29/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Howe Hendricks on November 9, 2010. (ncha, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
