McKinney v. South Carolina Department of Correction et al
| John McKinney |
| South Carolina Department of Correction, SCDC Contracted Medical Provider, SCDC Director, Bryan Stirling, Terre K. Marshall, Cecilia Reynolds, April Clark, Harriet Bailey, Stokes, Burnett and Blake |
| 8:2021cv03683 |
| November 10, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Jacquelyn D Austin |
| Cameron McGowan Currie |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #13 SECOND Proper Form Order, 14 Order on Motion for Copies, 11 x USM 285 forms, AO 440 Form, Complaint form, and copy guide placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to John McKinney 187439 MacDougall Correctional Institution Mag-1 1516 Old Gilliard Road Ridgeville, SC 29472 (sgri) |
Filing 14
TEXT ORDER denying #11 Motion for Copies. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 1/3/2022. (sgri)
|
|
Filing 13
SECOND PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 1/24/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 1/3/2022. (sgri)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Copies at no expense by John McKinney. Response to Motion due by 1/10/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri) |
| Filing 10 ***DOCUMENTS MAILED #7 Proper Form Order, 9 TEXT Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #8 Order Regarding Amendment, AO 440 Form, USM-285 Forms, and 1983 Complaint Form placed in U.S. Mail from Greenville Clerks Office to John McKinney 187439 MacDougall Correctional Institution Mag-1 1516 Old Gilliard Road Ridgeville, SC 29472 (sgri) |
|
Filing 9
TEXT ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 11/30/2021. (sgri)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER REGARDING AMENDMENT Plaintiff is hereby granted twenty-one (21) days from the date this order is entered (plus three days for mail time) to file an amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a) that corrects the deficiencies identified above,1 along with any appropriate service documents Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 11/30/2021. (sgri)
|
|
Filing 7
PROPER FORM ORDER Case to be brought into proper form by 12/21/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacquelyn D. Austin on 11/30/2021. (sgri)
|
| Filing 4 TRUE DIVISION FOR TRIAL: COLUMBIA. (sgri) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by John McKinney. Response to Motion due by 11/29/2021. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Financial Certificate, #2 Envelope) No proposed order. Motions referred to Jacquelyn D. Austin. (sgri) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Harriet Bailey, Blake, Burnett, April Clark, Terre K. Marshall, Cecilia Reynolds, SCDC Contracted Medical Provider, SCDC Director, South Carolina Department of Correction, Bryan Stirling, Stokes, filed by John McKinney. Service due by 2/8/2022 (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (sgri) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
