Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Clark v. Phipps et al
as 2:2023cv04203
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Karen Phipps, Michael Cassone and Alex Castle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Clark v. CVS Health Pharmacy, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04206
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
CVS Health Pharmacy, Inc., Aetna Resources, LLC, CVS Health Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. Littler Mendelson PC et al
as 2:2023cv04205
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Littler Mendelson PC, Richard DeAgazio, Alex Frondorf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Williams et al
as 2:2023cv04201
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Wendy Williams and Southeast Mental Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark v. Spitz Law Firm, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv04208
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Spitz Law Firm, LLC, Brian Spitz, Greg Shumaker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Clark v. Villilio et al
as 2:2023cv04202
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Susan Villilio, ADAMH Board of Franklin County, Erica Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Clark v. Brown
as 2:2023cv04204
Plaintiff:
April Clark
Defendant:
Chris Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04207
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Barton v. Monro et al
as 9:2022cv01621
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joe Barton
Defendant:
Yvonne Monro, Carol M. Hamilton, April Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
