Cunningham v. Lynch et al
||Eugene Jerome Cunningham
||Loretta Lynch, Thomas R Kane, Deborah G Schult, Ivan Negron, Lieutenant Canada, J Onuoha, P.A Hanson, Travis Bragg and Helen J Marberry
||April 25, 2016
||US District Court for the District of South Carolina
||Richard M Gergel
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 31, 2017
ORDER AND OPINION granting in part and denying in part 39 Motion to Dismiss; denying without prejudice 49 Motion to Strike ; denying without prejudice 57 Motion for Default Judgment; denying without prejudice 64 M otion to Amend/Correct. The Court grants Defendants' motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff's Bivens claims against Defendant Kane for lack of personal jurisdiction and against all other defendants on qualified immunity grounds. The Court den ies in part the motion to dismiss as to Plaintiff's claims for injunctive and declaratory relief. All claims against Lieutenant Canada and Dr. Ivan Negron for injunctive and declaratory relief are dismissed. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Attorney General Jefferson B. Sessions replaces Loretta Lynch as a party defendant. Plaintiff's claims for injunctive and declaratory relief against all remaining Defendants (Jefferson B. Sessions III; Thomas R. Kane; Dr. Deborah G. Schult; Dr. J. Onuoha; Harris Hansen; Travis Bragg; and Helen J. Marberry) will be allowed to proceed. Signed by Honorable Richard M Gergel on 5/31/2017.(ssam, )
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?