Cases 1 - 10 of 167
Demetrius Harris v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 19-14989
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CAPTAIN, ASSISTANT WARDEN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DEMETRIUS HARRIS
Cunningham v. Kane et al
as 9:2016cv03647
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jerome Cunningham
Defendant:
Thomas R Kane, Helen J Marberry, Travis Bragg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Williams v. Charles Samuels, Jr., et al
as 16-12050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons (Retired), SCOTT A. MIDDLEBROOKS, Warden-FCC Coleman USP-1 (Retired) and others
Cunningham v. Lynch et al
as 9:2016cv01292
Plaintiff:
Eugene Jerome Cunningham
Defendant:
Loretta Lynch, Thomas R Kane, Deborah G Schult and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dent v. Samuels et al
as 5:2015cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jason Dent
Defendant:
Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Joe Zimmerman, Helen J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Miller v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 15-1497
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM A. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, GARY ROGERS and TRISA HADDIX
RAGER v. AUGUSTINE
as 5:2015cv00035
Plaintiff:
DONALD W RAGER
Defendant:
PAIGE AUGUSTINE, KEITH BUFORD, S MALONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zone v. Marberry et al
as 5:2014cv00560
Plaintiff:
Michael Antwan Zone
Defendant:
Helen J. Marberry, Tamyra Jarvis and B. Blackmon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffery Paul v. Helen Marberry, et al
as 14-1722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFERY WILLIAM PAUL
Defendant - Appellee:
HELEN J. MARBERRY, HECTOR JOYNER, JOHN EDWARDS, Case Worker/SCU and others
MOON v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2014cv00067
Defendant:
R. BASKERVILLE, BEAVER, J. BEIGHLEY and others
Plaintiff:
DARNELL W. MOON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
