United States of America v. Mouser et al
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David Mouser, Sheila A Clark and Mary Corey
Case Number: 9:2021cv03967
Filed: December 8, 2021
Court: US District Court for the District of South Carolina
Presiding Judge: Mary Gordon Baker
Referring Judge: Richard M Gergel
Nature of Suit: Taxes
Cause of Action: 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Filing 18 ***DOCUMENT MAILED #17 Order to Notify of Address Change, a copy of the Court's Local Civil Rule 26.01 (D.S.C.) interrogatories, and a copy of the District Court's Pro Se Litigant Guide placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to Mary Corey PO Box 23843 Hilton Head Island, SC 29925. (apsn)
February 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER directing plaintiff to notify Clerk in writing of any address changes and submit fully completed answers to the Court's interrogatories pursuant to Local Civil Rule 26.01 (D.S.C.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker on 02/04/2022. (apsn)
February 1, 2022 Filing 16 CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge pursuant to LR 73.02. Magistrate Judge Mary Gordon Baker (sshe, )
January 31, 2022 Filing 15 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Mary Corey.(sshe, )
January 31, 2022 Filing 14 ***DOCUMENT MAILED 13 Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer, placed in U.S. Mail from Charleston Clerks Office to David Mouser 2 Glenmoor Place Hilton Head Island, SC 29926 (sshe, )
January 21, 2022 Filing 13 TEXT ORDER: For good cause shown, the extension of time until February 21, 2022 to file an answer or otherwise plead in this matter is granted. (Dkt. No. 7). AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the Direction of Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/21/22.(ltap, ) Modified document type on 1/24/2022 (sshe, ).
January 21, 2022 Filing 12 RESPONSE in Support re #7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint Response filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service)(Barnett, John)
January 20, 2022 Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. David Mouser served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Barnett, John)
January 20, 2022 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Mary Corey served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Barnett, John)
January 20, 2022 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by United States of America. Sheila A Clark served on 1/6/2022, answer due 1/27/2022. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Service)(Barnett, John)
January 19, 2022 Filing 8 TEXT ORDER: Defendant David Mouser, currently proceeding pro se, filed a motion for extension of time. (Dkt. No. 7). Defendant Mouser seeks a thirty (30) day extension of time until February 21, 2022 to file a response to the Complaint and obtain legal representation. (Id.). Defendant Mouser represents that counsel for the United States of America, Jeremy Rill, consents to the request. (Id.). The motion nor the docket reflect the date Defendant Mouser was legally served with the Summons and Complaint. The Court instructs the United States of America to file a response to Defendant Mousers motion within three (3) business days. AND IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered at the Direction of Honorable Richard M Gergel on 1/19/22. (ltap, ) Modified document type (Text) on 1/20/2022 (sshe, ).
January 18, 2022 Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time of 30 days to seek legal representation to file a response re #1 Complaint by David Mouser. Response to Motion due by 2/1/2022. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)No proposed order.(cper, )
December 8, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Mary Corey. (sshe, )
December 8, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Sheila A Clark. (sshe, )
December 8, 2021 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to David Mouser. (sshe, )
December 8, 2021 Filing 2 Local Rule 26.01 Answers to Interrogatories by United States of America.(sshe, )
December 8, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by United States of America. Service due by 3/8/2022(sshe, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: United States of America v. Mouser et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: United States of America
Represented By: John Douglas Barnett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David Mouser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sheila A Clark
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Corey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?