Cases 1 - 10 of 13
United States of America v. Mouser et al
as 9:2021cv03967
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
David Mouser, Sheila A Clark and Mary Corey
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Clark et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv02842
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Services Inc, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, DePuy International Limited and others
Special Master:
Special Master
Plaintiff:
Robert K Clark and Sheila D Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00120
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris-Clark v. Clark et al
as 1:2012cv02029
Plaintiff:
Sheila Harris-Clark
Defendant:
Ron Clark, Jr. and Brandy L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Harris-Clark v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2009cv02929
Plaintiff:
Sheila Harris-Clark
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Rod Moore's Body Shop, Electrical Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Type:
Other Statutes
Harris-Clark v. Jane Doe et al
as 1:2009mi00413
Plaintiff:
Sheila Harris-Clark
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Rod Moore's Body Shop, Electrical Contractor and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Type:
Other Statutes
Harris-Clark v. Brown et al
as 1:2009cv02502
Plaintiff:
Sheila Harris-Clark
Defendant:
Theresa Brown and Monica
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Type:
Other Statutes
Harris-Clark v. Brown et al
as 1:2009mi00372
Plaintiff:
Sheila Harris-Clark
Defendant:
Theresa Brown and Monica
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 No Cause Specified
Type:
Other Statutes
Contorelli v. Clark
as 5:2007cv04522
Petitioner:
Dianna Contorelli
Respondent:
Sheila A. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
