Harrison v. The County of Berkeley et al
| Dea'Shawn Harrison |
| The County of Berkeley, Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Duane Lewis, Mr. Phyall, Mr. Boyd, Ms. Davis, Aubrey Tucker, Officer Scott and Shaw |
| 9:2023cv03621 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of South Carolina |
| Molly H Cherry |
| Richard M Gergel |
| Prison:Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Amend/Correct #1 Complaint by Dea'Shawn Harrison. Response to Motion due by 9/25/2023. Add an additional 3 days only if served by mail or otherwise allowed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 6 or Fed. R. Crim. P. 45. (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter, #2 Envelope) Motions referred to Molly H Cherry. (agaz) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (Restricted Access) by Dea'Shawn Harrison. Motions referred to Molly H Cherry. (dgar). (Additional attachment(s) added on 9/11/2023: #1 Supplemental IFP, #2 Envelope) (agaz). (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/19/2023) (agaz, ). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Berkeley County Sheriff's Office, Boyd, Davis, Duane Lewis, Phyall, Scott, Shaw, The County of Berkeley, Aubrey Tucker, filed by Dea'Shawn Harrison. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(dgar). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Carolina District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
