Morgan v. United States et al
| David Brian Morgan |
| Governor of Oklahoma, State of Oklahoma, United States, Federal Bureau of Indians, Oklahoma Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General |
| 4:2019cv04028 |
| February 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Roberto A Lange |
| Prisoner Petitions - Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Transferred case received by the Western District of Oklahoma. (SST) |
Filing 6
ORDER of Transfer of case to the District of Western District of Oklahoma. Signed by U.S. District Judge Roberto A. Lange on 2/11/19. (SST) Mailed to David Brian Morgan via U.S. Postal Service on 2/11/2019 (SST).
|
| Case electronically transferred to District of Western District of Oklahoma. (SST) |
| Filing 5 New Case LETTER with enclosed Docket Sheet, Motion to Proceed IFP, and Prisoner Trust Account Report sent by Clerk's Office to David Brian Morgan. (SLT) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to File "Complaint" under 28 U.S.C. 2679(d)(2) and FICA and Bivens Action by David Brian Morgan. (SLT) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by David Brian Morgan. (SLT) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT pursuant to 42:1983 - Prisoner Civil Rights filed by David Brian Morgan. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (SLT) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
