Mann v. Clark et al
Daniel Ray Mann |
Doug Clark and Attorney General of South Dakota |
4:2021cv04158 |
September 27, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
Roberto A Lange |
Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER granting #11 Motion for Leave to File Brief. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 11/15/2021. (SLT) Modified on 11/15/2021 delivered to Daniel Ray Mann via usps (SLT). |
Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to File Brief That Exceeds the Page Limitation of Local Rule 7.1(B)(1) by Attorney General of South Dakota, Doug Clark. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Motion to Dismiss, #2 Attachment Brief in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #3 Exhibit Appellant's Brief, #4 Exhibit Sup Court Summary Dispositions) (VanPatten, Jonathan) |
Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondents shall have until 11/12/2021, to file their response. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 11/03/2021. (KLE) Modified on 11/3/2021 cc: sent to Daniel Mann via USPS (KLE). |
Filing 9 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Attorney General of South Dakota, Doug Clark. (VanPatten, Jonathan) |
Filing 8 RECEIVED: Brookings County Cases 05CRI16-764 and 05CIV19-313. ; Documents are on Clerk of Courts N Drive. (MSB) |
Filing 7 ORDER denying #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 10/13/2021. cc: mailed to Daniel Mann via USPS (KLE) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, Directing Service and Requiring Response. Signed by Chief Judge Roberto A. Lange on 10/05/2021. cc: Daniel Mann via USPS (KLE) |
Filing 5 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 together with the filing fee. A new case has opened. Copy of docket sheet sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed if the plaintiff's address changes. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (CLR) |
Filing 4 MEMORANDUM by Petitioner Daniel Ray Mann. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Inmate Filing) (CLR) |
Filing 3 PRISONER Trust Account Report. (CLR) (Main Document 3 replaced to correct page direction on 9/28/2021). (CLR) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Daniel Ray Mann. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Inmate Filing) (CLR) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 ($5.00 fee paid, receipt# SDX400055208). (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Inmate Filing) (CLR) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.