Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Gerald Locke, Sr. v. Brent Fluke, Warden, et al
as 24-1920
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke, Warden and Attorney General of South Dakota
Tripp v. Damguard et al
as 4:2023cv04105
Petitioner:
Kevin Christopher Micheal Tripp
Respondent:
Judge Natalie Damguard, Judge Robbin J. Howman, Thomas Hensley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Locke v. Fluke et al
as 1:2023cv01013
Petitioner:
Gerald D. Locke, Sr.
Respondent:
Brent Fluke and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jogaak Jogaak v. Warden, Daniel Sullivan, et al
as 23-1129
Petitioner:
Jogaak Deng Jogaak
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Sullivan and Attorney General of South Dakota
Elizeo Kalimba v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 22-3530
Petitioner / Appellant:
Elizeo Kalimba
Respondent / Appellee:
State of South Dakota, Attorney General of South Dakota and Lincoln County
Alexander Palomarez v. Daniel Sullivan, et al
as 22-3081
Petitioner:
Alexander Schroder Palomarez
Respondent:
Warden Daniel Sullivan and Attorney General of South Dakota
Daniel Gomez v. Michael Mattson, et al
as 22-2926
Petitioner:
Daniel Jose Gomez
Respondent:
Michael Mattson and Attorney General of South Dakota
Roger Raymond v. Mark Vargo, Atty General, et al
as 22-2913
Petitioner:
Roger Allen Raymond
Respondent:
Mark Vargo, Attorney General of South Dakota and Darin Young, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary
Daniel Mann v. Doug Clark, Warden, et al
as 22-2750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent / Appellee:
Doug Clark, Warden, SDSP and Attorney General of South Dakota
Joseph Arguello v. Mark Vargo, et al
as 22-2668
Petitioner:
Joseph Arguello
Respondent:
Mark Vargo, Attorney General for South Dakota and Darin Young, Warden State Penitentiary
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
