Palomarez v. Young
Petitioner: Alexander Palomarez
Respondent: Warden Darin Young and Attorney General of South Dakota
Case Number: 5:2019cv05081
Filed: December 13, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of South Dakota
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey L Viken
Referring Judge: Daneta Wollmann
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions: Habeas Corpus - General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 30, 2020 Filing 7 LETTER Received from Alexander Palomarez. (SAC)
January 22, 2020 Filing Fee Received from Alexander Palomarez. Fee Amount: $5.00, Receipt No.: #SDX500006217. (CLR)
January 2, 2020 Filing 6 DECLARATION of Alexander Palomarez re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (SKK)
January 2, 2020 Filing 5 SUPPLEMENT by Petitioner Alexander Palomarez re #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (28:2254). (SKK)
January 2, 2020 Filing 4 PRISONER Trust Account Report. (SKK)
January 2, 2020 Filing 3 MOTION to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Declaration by Alexander Palomarez. (SKK)
December 13, 2019 Filing 2 NOTICE TO PETITIONER: The Clerks Office has received your document and construed it as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. Although a new case has been opened, your case cannot proceed further until you either pay the filing fee OR complete and return the enclosed Motion to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Declaration AND Prisoner Trust Account Report (to be completed by the institution where you are incarcerated.). Copy of docket sheet, 2254 packet, motion to proceed IFP, and Prisoner Trust Account form sent to petitioner. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. (MSB)
December 13, 2019 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28:2254 filed by Alexander Palomarez. (Attachments: #1 Cover letter w/ attachments) (MSB) (Main Document 1 replaced on 12/16/2019) (MSB).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Palomarez v. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Darin Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of South Dakota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Alexander Palomarez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?