Johnson et al v Shchepler et al
| Surgee Rae Johnson and Deborah Susan Herrington |
| Carla Shchepler, Robert Even and Lance Russell |
| 5:2022cv05044 |
| May 9, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of South Dakota |
| Charles B Kornmann |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 Mail sent to Deborah Susan Herrington was returned as undeliverable. #11 Judgment of Dismissal and Appeal Packet was returned. (DLC) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension by Surgee Rae Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Attachments) (SKK) Modified on 7/7/2022 (VMM). |
| Filing 12 Mail sent to Deborah Susan Herrington was returned as undeliverable. #10 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis,, Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel, was returned. (DLC) |
| Filing 11 JUDGMENT of Dismissal. Sent to Surgee Johnson via Email with Appeal Packet and to Deborah Herrington via USPS with Appeal Packet. (SKK) |
Filing 10
ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot #3 Motion to Appoint Counsel. The case is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Signed by U.S. District Judge Charles B. Kornmann on June 13, 2022. (Sent to Deborah Susan Herrington via US Postal Service) (DLC)
|
| Filing 9 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Surgee Rae Johnson re #1 Complaint. (DLC) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT by Plaintiff Surgee Rae Johnson re #1 Complaint. (Attachments: #1 Attachment) (DLC) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PLAINTIFFS: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with an Application to Proceed without Prepaying Fees or Costs on behalf of Mr. Johnson. A new case has been opened. Copy of docket sheet and blank IFP Motion sent to plaintiff Deborah Sue Harrington. Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Modified to add language re sending IPF motion to Plaintiff Harrington on 5/9/2022 (DJP). |
| Filing 6 (FILED IN ERROR) NOTICE TO PLAINTIFF: The Clerks Office has received your Complaint together with an Application to Proceed without Prepaying Fees or Costs. A new case has been opened. Copy of docket sheet mailed to Deborah Harrington (DJP) Any further documents or correspondence you send to the Clerks Office concerning your case must include the case number. All documents submitted for filing must also contain an original signature. Submitted documents are electronically scanned for filing and they become the official court record. The quality of the official court record is determined by the quality of the original documents received for filing. Writing should only be on one side of the paper and writing must be dark enough for scanning. All documents must be on 8.5 x 11 inch paper. A request to electronically file documents in your case must be made through the PACER Service Center at www.pacer.uscourts.gov. The plaintiff must keep the Court informed of the plaintiff's address changes, including changes to primary and secondary email addresses. If the Court is not kept informed and multiple items are returned as undelivered, the plaintiff's case may be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Modified on 5/9/2022 (DJP). Modified on 5/9/2022 (DJP). |
| Filing 5 REGISTRATION for Electronic Notice by Surgee Rae Johnson. Pro se party Surgee Rae Johnson will now receive electronic notice of unsealed documents filed in this case. Refer to the CM/ECF User Manual located on the court website at www.sdd.uscourts.gov for information about accessing documents. (DJP) (Main Document 5 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Surgee Rae Johnson. (DJP) (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). (Main Document 3 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Surgee Rae Johnson. (DJP) (Main Document 2 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Thank you note) (DJP) (Main Document 1 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). (Attachment 1 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). (Attachment 2 replaced on 5/9/2022) (DJP). |
| NOTICE of Filing Error (wrong case number) 6 New Case Letter - Nonprisoner Case was filed in error and should be disregarded. (DJP) |
| Remark: This case was inadvertently assigned the wrong case number (22-4060). The case number has been corrected to 22-5044 and this case number should be used on all further pleadings. (DJP) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the South Dakota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
