Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rice v. Buel
as 4:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Lance Russell Rice
Defendant:
Travis J Buel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Russell v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv08836
Plaintiff:
Lance Russell
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Surgee Johnson, et al v. Carla Schepler, et al
as 22-2560
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Surgee Rae Johnson and Deborah Susan Herrington
Defendant / Appellee:
Carla Schepler, City, Robert Even, County Sheriff and Lance Russell, State DA
Lance Dixon v. Kris Karberg
as 22-2153
Petitioner:
Lance Russell Dixon
Respondent:
Kris Karberg, Warden
Johnson et al v Shchepler et al
as 5:2022cv05044
Plaintiff:
Surgee Rae Johnson and Deborah Susan Herrington
Defendant:
Carla Shchepler, Robert Even and Lance Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Dixon v. Karberg
as 4:2022cv00044
Petitioner:
Lance Russell Dixon
Respondent:
Kristofer Karberg
Interested Party:
Kevin Cmelik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2012cv08933
Plaintiff:
Kathryn Russell and Lance Russell
Defendant:
Coloplast A/S, Coloplast Manufacturing US, LLC, Mentor Worldwide LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lance Dixon v. John Ault
as 12-1490
Petitioner - Appellant:
Lance Russell Dixon
Respondent - Appellee:
John Ault, Warden
Dixon v. Ault
as 4:2010cv00024
Petitioner:
Lance Russell Dixon
Respondent:
John Ault
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Janis Schmidt v. Louise Big Boy, et al
as 07-2457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Janis Schmidt
Defendant - Appellee:
Louise Big Boy, Judge Lisa F. Cook, Robert Montileaux and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
