Ezell v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County et al
Timothy W. Ezell |
Reuben Hodge, Darrell Murphy, Tina Brewer, Bruce Westbrooks, Carl Odle, Melvin Butler, f/n/u Williams, Wayne Earl Moore, F/N/U Burns, Glenfield Knight, Richard Carter, Metropolitan General Hospital, f/n/u Brewster, Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson County, Metropolitan Council, Karl Dean and Correctional Medical Services |
3:2011cv00405 |
April 28, 2011 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee |
Nashville Office |
Davidson |
Aleta A. Trauger |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 112 ORDER: On July 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 108 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of l aw of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE in its entirety pursuant to Rule 16(f)(1) and Rule 41(b), FED. R. CIV. P. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/23/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb) |
Filing 100 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Karl Dean, Metropolitan Government of Nashville and Davidson County, the Metropolitan Council and the Metropolitan Hospital Authority (Docket No. 31 ) is GRANTED. T he Motion to Dismiss filed by defendants Brewer, Hodge, Murphy, Odle, and Westbrooks (Docket No. 42 ) is GRANTED. The Motion For Summary Judgment filed by defendants Brewster, Burns, Butler, Carter and Correctional Medical Services (Docket No. 83 ) is GRANTED. All claims against defendants Karl Dean, Metropolitan Government, Metropolitan Council, Metropolitan Hospital Authority, Brewer, Hodge, Murphy, Odle, Westbrooks, Brewster, Burns, Butler, Carter and Correctional Medical Services are DISM ISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's Motion For Preliminary Injunction (Docket No. 33 ) is DENIED. This case is REMANDED to the Magistrate Judge in order to determine the status of the claims against defendant Wayne Earl Moore. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/5/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb) |
Filing 89 ORDER: On February 24, 2012, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 76 ), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions o f law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendants Glenfield Knight and Charles Williams (Docket No. 25 ) is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims against these two defendants are DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/27/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb) |
Filing 29 ORDER: Motion in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss 24 is Denied. A motion to dismiss has not been filed by the defendants, and the plaintiff's motion actually appears to be a response to the answer 17 filed by Defendants Charl es Williams and Glenfield Knight. The plaintiff shall have until 10/7/2011, to file a response to the motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff is advised that failure to file a timely response to the motion for summary judgment could result in the dismissal of the claims brought against these defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 9/1/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.