Cases 1 - 10 of 75
Carter v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2024pq00158
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03488
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Carter v. Best Supply of Nashville, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00540
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter
Defendant:
Best Supply of Nashville, LLC, Paul Smith and Tim Small
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1161 COBRA - Continuation Coverage
USA v. William Carter, Jr., et al
as 22-12744
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHARD CARTER, JR.
Carter v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00491
Plaintiff:
Richard Carter
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv60027
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv35889
Plaintiff:
TAMAINE RICHARD CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv29193
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD CARTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lyman et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2021cv10024
Plaintiff:
David Lyman, Timothy Thuering, Vincent Brady and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Richard Carter
as 20-14852
Defendant / Appellant:
RICHARD CARTER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
