Settle v. Phillips (ASH)
Petitioner: Mike Settle
Respondent: Shawn Phillips
Case Number: 1:2017cv01237
Filed: December 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee
Office: Jackson Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Edward G. Bryant
Presiding Judge: James D. Todd
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER TRANSFERRING § 2241 PETITION TO THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AS A SECOND OR SUCCESSIVE PETITION. Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 4/23/2020. (mbm)
March 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER TO UPDATE THE DOCKET AND DENYING MOTION TO RELINQUISH PRIMARY JURISDICTION (ECF No. 7). Signed by Judge James D. Todd on 3/25/19. (mbm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Settle v. Phillips (ASH)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mike Settle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Shawn Phillips
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?