Philip v. Executive Clemency Unit et al
Ashton Jamarr Philip |
Executive Clemency Unit, Zane Duncan, Roberta Kustoff, Barrett Rich, Mae Beavers, Bill Lee, Margie Hays, Mary Beth Nale, Dustin Krugel, Richard Montgomery, Gary Saulcon, Tim Gobble, Brandy Doty, Amber Lineberry and Elizabeth Whiteside |
1:2024cv01014 |
January 8, 2024 |
US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
Samuel H Mays |
Tu M Pham |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing the $350 filing fee in accordance with PLRA, signed by Judge Samuel H. Mays, Jr. on 02/07/2024. (Mays, Samuel) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Pro Se Prisoner track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (skc) |
Filing 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without prepaying fees or costs filed by Ashton Jamarr Philip. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Certificate, #3 envelope)(skc) |
Filing 1 PRO SE COMPLAINT 42 USC 1983 filed by Ashton Jamarr Philip. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Cover Letter, #9 Judge Label, #10 envelope)(skc) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.