Cases 1 - 10 of 135
Helton v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00588
Plaintiff:
Ricky M. Helton
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Skrmetti et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Rex Allen Moore
Defendant:
Jonathan Skrmetti, T.D.O.C./B.O.P.P., Johnny Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liles v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00485
Plaintiff:
Dustin Liles
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Odell et al v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Andrew M. Odell, G. Doe, J. Doe and others
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jim Hivner, Sara Lawson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Makupson v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Jamie Anthony Makupson
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Glenn Jacobs, Chief Oates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
David Russell Brooks
Defendant:
Bill Lee and David Roush
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jonathan Skrmetti and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Philip v. Executive Clemency Unit et al
as 1:2024cv01014
Plaintiff:
Ashton Jamarr Philip
Defendant:
Executive Clemency Unit, Zane Duncan, Roberta Kustoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanford v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv01366
Plaintiff:
James R. Sanford, III
Defendant:
Governor Bill Lee, David B. Rausch, Frank Strada and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #1 et al v. Rausch et al
as 3:2023cv00457
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Defendant:
David Rausch, William Lee, David B. Rausch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
