Davis v. City of Memphis Fire Department et al
| Reginald Alan Davis |
| Alvin Benson, Sandra Richards, Daryle Payton, City of Memphis Fire Department and A.C. Wharton |
| 2:2011cv03076 |
| December 10, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Memphis Office |
| Shelby |
| S. Thomas Anderson |
| Charmiane G. Claxton |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
144
ORDER granting 132 Motion for Summary Judgment and denying Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/16/2013. (Anderson, S.)
|
|
Filing
76
ORDER denying 72 Motion for Contempt and for Sanctions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charmiane G. Claxton on 8/27/2012. (Claxton, Charmiane)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER granting 35 Motion to Amend/Correct; denying 44 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; denying 25 Motion to Dismiss; denying 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; granting 26 Motion for More Definite Statement. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 5/31/12. (Anderson, S.)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 40 Motion TRO; deferring ruling on 40 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; deferring ruling on 40 Motion for Permanent Injunction; denying 41 Motion for TRO; denying 42 Motion for TRO. Signed by Judge S. Thomas Anderson on 4/25/12. (Anderson, S.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
