Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Milton Simpson v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 15-6154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON LEON SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, former Tennessee Governor, WILLIAM OLDHAM, "Bill"-Shelby County Sheriff, ROBERT MOORE, Chief of Jail Operations and others
Walker v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02340
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Walker
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, County of Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Sear Dept. Stores et al
as 2:2015cv02323
Plaintiff:
Willie Ervin Moore
Defendant:
Sear Dept. Stores, Shelby County Jail Complex, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Hayes, Sr. v. A.C. Wharton, et al
as 14-5948
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY D. HAYES, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
A.C. WHARTON, Mayor of the City of Memphis, CITY OF MEMPHIS, DENEEN ALSADI, H.R. Manager and others
Ross v. Greer et al
as 2:2014cv02582
Plaintiff:
Rufus Ross
Defendant:
G. Greer, A.C. Wharton and Toney Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prewitt v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry Lorenzo Prewitt, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mark Ward, Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-6275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
King v. Wade et al
as 2:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
Randy Wade, Steve Cohen, A.C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water, et al
as 13-5163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMANTHA REED-RAJAPAKSE
Defendant - Appellee:
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS AND WATER, PRESIDENT JERRY COLLINS, CITY OF MEMPHIS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
