Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Milton Simpson v. Phil Bredesen, et al
as 15-6154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MILTON LEON SIMPSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PHIL BREDESEN, former Tennessee Governor, WILLIAM OLDHAM, "Bill"-Shelby County Sheriff, ROBERT MOORE, Chief of Jail Operations and others
Moore v. Sear Dept. Stores et al
as 2:2015cv02323
Plaintiff:
Willie Ervin Moore
Defendant:
Sear Dept. Stores, Shelby County Jail Complex, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ross v. Greer et al
as 2:2014cv02582
Plaintiff:
Rufus Ross
Defendant:
G. Greer, A.C. Wharton and Toney Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2014cv02295
Plaintiff:
Joseph E. Jones, III
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of TN, Shelby County D.A. Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prewitt v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02884
Plaintiff:
Larry Lorenzo Prewitt, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Memphis, Mark Ward, Shelby County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. The City of Memphis et al
as 2:2013cv02082
Defendant:
The City of Memphis, Memphis Police Department, Sgt. Goods and others
Plaintiff:
Maurice D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Edward et al
as 2:2012cv02806
Plaintiff:
Julian Frankin Carter, II
Defendant:
Doug Edward, Bug's Buggy Auto Sale, Daniel Bug and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Shelby Co. Jail et al
as 2:2012cv02457
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Thomas
Defendant:
Shelby Co. Jail, A.C. Wharton, Mark H. Luttrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roebuck v. Aramark et al
as 2:2011cv02789
Plaintiff:
Calvin Roebuck
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Jail, A.C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Kustoff et al
as 3:2011cv01148
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
David Kustoff, Edward L Stanton, III, State of Tennessee and others
Amicu:
Shelby Count Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
