Mangum v. Lee et al
| Gerald Mangum |
| William E. Haslam, Mark Gwyn, Bill Lee and David B. Rausch |
| 2:2021cv02637 |
| October 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Western District of Tennessee |
| Mark S Norris |
| Tu M Pham |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Summons Issued as to Bill Lee, David B. Rausch. Copies of summonses, USM 285 form, complaint, and order #10 placed in USM mailbox to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(btg)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER to substitute defendants and reissue and effect service of process. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on November 30, 2021. (cmp)
|
|
Filing 9
Summons Returned Unexecuted as to Mark Gwyn, William E. Haslam. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(btg)
|
|
Filing 8
Summons Issued as to Mark Gwyn, William E. Haslam. Summonses, complaint, USM 285 Form, and order placed in USM mailbox to effect service. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(btg)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; ORDER to Issue and Effect Service of Process. Signed by Chief Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham on October 7, 2021. (cmp)
|
|
Pursuant to Administrative Order 2013-05, this case has been assigned to the United States magistrate judge for management of all pretrial matters, including screening of the complaint to determine whether or not summons shall be issued by the Clerk pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) and Local Rule 4.1(b)(2) (csf)
|
|
Filing 6
NOTICE TO COMPLY WITH PLAN FOR ALTERNATE DISPUTE RESOLUTION (ADR): Pursuant to Section to 2.1 of the ADR Plan, all civil cases filed on or after Sept. 1, 2014, shall be referred automatically for ADR. For compliance requirements, refer to the ADR Plan at: http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/ADRPlan.pdf (csf)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO CONSENT TO THE EXERCISE OF CIVIL JURISDICTION BY A MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), Fed.R.Civ.P.73, and Local Rule 72.1, this Court has designated the Magistrate Judges of this District to conduct trials and otherwise dispose of any civil case that is filed in this Court. Your decision to consent, or not consent, to the referral of your case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and entry of a final judgment must be entirely voluntary. The judge or magistrate judge to whom the case has been assigned will not be informed of your decision unless all parties agree that the case may be referred to a magistrate judge for these specific purposes. A less than unanimous decision will not be communicated by this office to either the judge or magistrate judge. The consent form is available on the courts website at https://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/forms-and-applications.php (csf)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE OF CASE TRACKING ASSIGNMENT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 16.2: Pursuant to Local Rule 16.2, this case has been assigned to the Standard track. http://www.tnwd.uscourts.gov/pdf/content/LocalRules.pdf (csf)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE: Declined agreement to receive notice of electronic filing (NEF) by Gerald Mangum (csf)
|
|
Filing 2
Pro Se MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Gerald Mangum. (csf)
|
|
Filing 1
PRO SE COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief filed by Gerald Mangum against All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Case from TNMD, #2 Judicial Cards)(csf)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Tennessee Western District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
