Johnson v. Gann et al
David Darnell Johnson |
T Grasser, FNU Satchell, FNU Watts, S L Lacy, B Gann, FNU Gates, B Gallentine, FNU Paradise, FNU Owens, FNU Childress, Building Major FNU Cato and Unknown Party |
1:2019cv00005 |
January 4, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Marcia A Crone |
Keith F Giblin |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 7, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF RECEIPT by David Darnell Johnson on 2/1/19 as to #3 Order for Initial Partial Filing Fee. (tkd, ) |
Filing 3 ORDER for payment of Initial Partial Filing Fee of $12.00 within 30 days from David Darnell Johnson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 1/28/19. (tkd, ) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by David Darnell Johnson. (tkd, ) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Cato, FNU Childress, B Gallentine, B Gann, FNU Gates, T Grasser, S L Lacy, FNU Owens, FNU Paradise, FNU Satchell, Unknown Party(R&D Property Officer), Unknown Party(Administrative Remedy Coordinator), Unknown Party(Warden, USP Beaumont), Unknown Party(Regional Director, South Central Regional Office), Unknown Party(Correctional Officer), FNU Watts, filed by David Darnell Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(tkd, ) |
CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Keith Giblin pursuant to a Standing Order (tkd, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.