Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gann v. Wilmington Trust, National Association, successor trustee to Citibank, N.A. et al
as 4:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Scott B. Gann
Defendant:
Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Wilmington Trust, National Association, successor trustee to Citibank, N.A. and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Clervrain v. Chapa
as 21-40123
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Laguna, Correctional Psychologist, in his/her Individual and Official Capacity, B. Gann, Correctional Operation Lieutenant, in his/her Individual and Official Capacity, A. Collins, Correctional Counselor, in his/her Individual and official capacity and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Manetirony Clervrain
Johnson v. Gann et al
as 1:2019cv00005
Defendant:
T Grasser, FNU Satchell, FNU Watts and others
Plaintiff:
David Darnell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cabrera v. Lara et al
as 1:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Flavio Cabrera
Defendant:
FNU Lara, C Matt and B Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gross v. Gann et al
as 1:2013cv00166
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Gross, M.D.
Defendant:
Billy B. Gann and Bear Creek Apartments, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Gray Casualty and Surety Company v. Prentiss County Mississippi Board of Supervisors et al
as 1:2012cv00015
Plaintiff:
The Gray Casualty and Surety Company
Defendant:
Prentiss County Mississippi Board of Supervisors, Cook Coggin Engineers, Inc. , Kenneth P. Geno, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott Gann v. SEC
as 09-60435
Petitioner:
SCOTT B GANN
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Scott Gann v. SEC
as 09-60437
Petitioner:
SCOTT B GANN
Respondent:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC v. Gann
as 08-10404
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant - Appellant:
SCOTT B GANN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
