Spencer v. Edoigiawene et al
| Jeremy P Spencer |
| FNU Brown, FNU Archibong, FNU Edoigiawene, FNU Graham, FNU Osegro and FNU Scott |
| 1:2019cv00183 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Keith F Giblin |
| Thad Heartfield |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jeremy P Spencer.(bjc, ) (Original pleading filed in 1:17cv63) |
Filing 1
ORDERED that Plaintiff's Supplement to Complaint (doc #17) is severed from the above-referenced civil rights action. Plaintiffs claims against defendants at the Jefferson County Correctional Facility shall remain in the above-referenced civil rights action. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to assign two separate civil action numbers: (1) concerning defendants at the Larry Gist Unit and (2) concerning defendants at the Stringfellow Unit. The latter two civil rights actions should be assigned according to the regular practice for allotment of newly-filed civil actions. The Clerk of Court is further DIRECTED to STRIKE Plaintiffs Supplement to Complaint (docket entry no. 17) from the above-referenced civil rights action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin on 4/15/2019. (bjc, ) (Original order filed in 1:17cv63)
|
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin. (bjc, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
