Cases 1 - 10 of 86
Medlin v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2026cv03183
Plaintiff:
Haven Medlin
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2026cv00111
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
Mecklenburg County Sheriff's Office, FNU Graham, FNU Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowe v. McFadden et al
as 3:2025cv00717
Plaintiff:
James Crowe
Defendant:
FNU Canty, FNU White, FNU Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faulk v. Scott
as 1:2025cv00427
Plaintiff:
Christopher Faulk
Defendant:
FNU Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frank v. Scott et al
as 1:2025cv00352
Plaintiff:
Sherman Marvin Frank
Defendant:
FNU Scott and V. Hebert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Collier
as 24-50703
Defendant:
All Officers, Medical Staff and Commissary Staff at Hughes Unit, Ms. FNU Harmon/Washburn, Jodi Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Bailey, also known as Markiesha Bailey
Carmichael v. Pastrana et al
as 5:2024cv00406
Defendant:
FNU Floundary, J. Pastrana, FNU Sterns and others
Plaintiff:
Kenja O. Carmichael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. Core Civic, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv01126
Defendant:
Waynard Winbush, FNU Garr, FNU Walton and others
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Scott et al
as 6:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Mark Charles Bailey
Defendant:
FNU Scott, FNU Parker, Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYKINS v. LOCKLEAR et al
as 1:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
RODERICK BOYKINS
Defendant:
S.R.G. CAPTAIN LOCKLEAR, (FNU SCOTT) MS. SCOTT, DEAN LOCKLEAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
