Esthay v. Davis et al
| Kirt Allen Esthay |
| Michael B Crow, FNU Wallace, Rodney J Simon, Lorie Davis, Christopher Norworthy, Grace N Ekeke, Calvin E Tucker, Chasity G Wallace, Jones Latonia and Stephanie A Lute |
| 1:2019cv00299 |
| July 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marcia A Crone |
| Keith F Giblin |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kirt Allen Esthay. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENTAL COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kirt Allen Esthay. Docket sheet mailed on 9/9/19. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kirt Allen Esthay. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 6 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kirt Allen Esthay.(mrp, ) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Kirt Allen Esthay. Docket sheet mailed on 7/31/19. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 4 Letter from Kirt Allen Esthay. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 3 Letter from Kirt Allen Esthay. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kirt Allen Esthay. (mrp, ) |
| Filing 1 42 USC 1983 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kirt Allen Esthay. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(mrp, ) |
| CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Keith F. Giblin.(mrp, ) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
