Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Walton v. UTMB Medical et al
as 1:2020cv00070
Defendant:
Robert Cade, Darren Wallace, Calvin E Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Gene Walton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esthay v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 1:2020cv00060
Defendant:
Michael B Crow, Grace N Ekeke, NFN Wallace and others
Plaintiff:
Kirt Allen Esthay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esthay v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2020cv00250
Defendant:
Michael B Crow, D Johnson, Christopher Norworthy and others
Plaintiff:
Kirt Allen Esthay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander v. Tucker et al
as 1:2019cv00369
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Zena Stephens, Calvin E Tucker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Mitchell Alexander
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Douglas v. Boykin et al
as 1:2019cv00306
Defendant:
Christopher L Norsworthy, Aaron L Thompkins, Bruce H Fredrick and others
Plaintiff:
Latthen Chance Douglas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Esthay v. Davis et al
as 1:2019cv00299
Defendant:
Michael B Crow, FNU Wallace, Rodney J Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Kirt Allen Esthay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerwin Woodard v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 19-40178
Defendant / Appellee:
JERRY J. SANCHEZ, BRAD LIVINGSTON, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Executive Director, I. AROVEHUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KERWIN WOODARD
Dunham v. Ward et al
as 3:2018cv00244
Defendant:
Michael B Crow, Aaron J Tomkins, R. Pool and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Eugene Dunham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calvin Hester v. Angela Mamukuyomi, et al
as 17-41287
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CALVIN JARROD HESTER
Defendant - Appellee:
OFFICER ANGELA MAMUKUYOMI, OFFICER PAUL AJOKU, III, CAPTAIN GRETA K. BENNETT and others
Woodard v. Livingston et al.
as 3:2017cv00113
Plaintiff:
Kerwin Woodard
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Mark Jones, Charlesanne E Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
