De La Cruz v. Target Corporation
| Maria De la Cruz |
| Target Corporation |
| 1:2023cv00444 |
| December 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Marcia A Crone |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Submission of Proposed Agreed Docket Control/Scheduling order by Target Corporation . (Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 7 JOINT REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Ly, Valerie) |
| NOTICE of Hearing: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 2/12/2024 at 02:30 PM in Ctrm 3 (Beaumont) before District Judge Marcia A. Crone in chambers. Counsel must appear in person. (jc, ) |
Filing 6
ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) conference by 1/11/2024 and file a joint written report by 1/25/2024. Signed by District Judge Marcia A. Crone on 12/14/23. (tkd, )
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Target Corporation of Filing of State Court Docket Sheet for Removal (Attachments: #1 State Court Docket Sheet)(Ly, Valerie) Modified text on 12/11/2023 (tkd, ). |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (tkd, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Marcia A. Crone. (tkd, ) |
| Filing 5 ORIGINAL ANSWER (filed in state court) to #4 Original Petition, filed by Target Corporation.(tkd, ) |
| Filing 4 ORIGINAL PETITION (filed in state court) against Target Corporation, filed by Maria De La Cruz.(tkd, ) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation. (Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Corporation from 172nd JDC Jefferson County, case number 23DCCV1697. (Filing fee $405 receipt number ATXEDC-9857875), filed by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits A and B, #2 Exhibit C, #3 Exhibit D)(Ly, Valerie) Modified text on 12/11/2023 (tkd, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/11/2023: #4 Civil Cover Sheet) (tkd, ). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: De La Cruz v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Maria De la Cruz | |
| Represented By: | Javier Cabanillas |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Valerie Lu Ly |
| Represented By: | Troy Allen Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
