Johnson v. Target Corporation
| Monica Johnson |
| Target Corporation |
| 1:2023cv00456 |
| December 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
| Michael J Truncale |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1391 Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 AGREED MOTION for Protective Order by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ly, Valerie) |
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to #6 Partial Motion to Dismiss. Responses due by 2/16/2024. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 1/26/24. (tkd, )
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Def. Partial Motion to Dismiss by Monica Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order on Unopposed Motion for Extension)(Bernsen, David) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER directing the parties to conduct a Rule 26(f) Attorney Conference on or before February 9, 2024. Rule 16 Case Management Conference set for 3/1/2024 at 10:00 AM in Room 221 before District Judge Michael J. Truncale. Signed by District Judge Michael J. Truncale on 1/23/24. (kcv, )
|
| Filing 6 Partial MOTION to Dismiss by Target Corporation. (Williams, Troy) Modified text on 1/19/2024 (tkd, ). (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/22/2024: #1 Proposed Order) (tkd, ). |
| Filing 5 CORRECTED Original ANSWER and Defenses to #1 Complaint by Target Corporation.(Williams, Troy) Modified text on 1/19/2024 (tkd, ). |
| Clerk's LR CV-10(d) Notice of Deficiency as to #3 Answer to Complaint, filed by Target Corporation. - LR CV-7(a) requires each CV pleading, motion, or response to motion to be filed as a separate document, and LRs CV-10 & CR-49(a) require each CR motion to be filed as a separate document. Recommended cure: Within one day, Filer must refile with the word Corrected in the title of the document. The filer should use the same ECF event and when offered the docket text enhancement dropdown, select CORRECTED so it will also appear in the docket text. (tkd, ) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Target Corporation. (Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 3 DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED. This document does not comply with Local Rule CV-7(a).Target Corporations Partial Motion to Dismiss and Subject Thereto, Original Answer and Defenses to Plaintiffs Original Complaint ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Target Corporation.(Ly, Valerie) Modified text on 1/19/2024 (tkd, ). |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Target Corporation and emailed to pltf's attorney for service (tkd, ) |
| Case assigned to District Judge Michael J. Truncale. (tkd, ) |
| In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (tkd, ) |
| DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Monica Johnson. (tkd, ) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Target Corporation ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-9871676.), filed by Monica Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bernsen, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
