Dali Wireless, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
Dali Wireless, Inc. |
T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, CommScope Holding Company, Inc., Commscope, Inc. and CommScope Technologies LLC |
2:2022cv00414 |
October 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Texas |
Roy S Payne |
Robert W Schroeder |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 24 Defendants' Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CommScope Holding Company, Inc., CommScope Technologies LLC, Commscope, Inc. (Findlay, Eric) |
Filing 23 ORDER granting #22 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer . Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 12/14/2022. (nkl, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed SECOND Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CommScope Technologies LLC to 12/30/2022; CommScope Holding Company, Inc. to 12/30/2022; Commscope, Inc. to 12/30/2022. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 22 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 21 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dali Wireless, Inc.. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. served on 11/9/2022, answer due 12/15/2022. (Henry, Claire) |
Filing 20 SUMMONS Issued as to CommScope Holding Company, Inc.. (nkl, ) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting #18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond toPlaintiffs Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne on 11/8/2022. (nkl, ) |
Answer Due Deadline Updated for Ericsson Inc. to 2/13/2023; Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson to 2/13/2023. (nkl, ) |
Filing 18 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move, Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint and Waiver of Foreign Service Requirement, MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, by Ericsson Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Dacus, Deron) |
Filing 17 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re CommScope Holding Company, Inc., CommScope Technologies LLC, Commscope, Inc.(Findlay, Eric) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for CommScope Technologies LLC to 12/15/2022; CommScope Holding Company, Inc. to 12/15/2022; Commscope, Inc. to 12/15/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 16 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile USA, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 15 Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile US, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 12/29/2022. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 12/14/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed Second Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile US, Inc. to 12/29/2022. 15 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( nkl, ) |
Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile US, Inc. to 12/14/2022. 30 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, ) |
Filing 14 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile USA, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 13 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile US, Inc..( Smith, Melissa) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dali Wireless, Inc.. CommScope Holding Company, Inc. served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022; CommScope Technologies LLC served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022; Commscope, Inc. served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022; Ericsson Inc. served on 10/25/2022, answer due 11/15/2022; T-Mobile US, Inc. served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022; T-Mobile USA, Inc. served on 10/24/2022, answer due 11/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Executed Summons - T-Mobile USA, Inc., #2 Executed Summons - Ericsson, Inc., #3 Executed Summons - CommScope Holding Company, Inc., #4 Executed Summons - CommScope Inc., #5 Executed Summons - CommScope Technologies LLC)(Henry, Claire) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cristofer Ivan Leffler on behalf of Dali Wireless, Inc. (Leffler, Cristofer) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Steven Thomas Skelley on behalf of Dali Wireless, Inc. (Skelley, Steven) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Joseph Michael Abraham on behalf of Dali Wireless, Inc. (Abraham, Joseph) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Cliff Win, Jr on behalf of Dali Wireless, Inc. (Win, Cliff) |
Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stefan Szpajda on behalf of Dali Wireless, Inc. (Szpajda, Stefan) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Issued as to CommScope Holding Company, Inc., CommScope Technologies LLC, Commscope, Inc., Ericsson Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson. (Attachments: #1 Summons(es) CommScope Holding Company, Inc., #2 Summons(es) CommScope Inc., #3 Summons(es) CommScope Technologies LLC, #4 Summons(es) Ericsson Inc., #5 Summons(es) T-Mobile US, Inc., #6 Summons(es) T-Mobile USA, Inc.)(nkl, ) |
In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (nkl, ) |
Case Assigned to District Judge Robert W. Schroeder, III and Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne. (nkl, ) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Andrea Leigh Fair on behalf of Dali Wireless, Inc. (Fair, Andrea) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Dali Wireless, Inc.. (Henry, Claire) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Dali Wireless, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Dali Systems Co. Ltd for Dali Wireless, Inc.. (Henry, Claire) |
Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Henry, Claire) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CommScope Holding Company, Inc., CommScope Technologies LLC, Commscope, Inc., Ericsson Inc., T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXEDC-9192657.), filed by Dali Wireless, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 10,750,382, #2 Exhibit 2 - U.S. Patent No. 9,197,358, #3 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 11,026,232, #4 Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 10,334,499, #5 Exhibit 5 - U.S.Patent No. 8,682,338, #6 Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 11,006,343, #7 Exhibit 7 - U.S. Patent No. 9,820,171, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Henry, Claire) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.