Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Plaintiff: Smart RF Inc.
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC, Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC, Sprint Solutions LLC and Sprint Spectrum LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv00195
Filed: March 19, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 7, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #14 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT Sprint LLC answer due 5/31/2024; Sprint Solutions LLC answer due 5/31/2024; Sprint Spectrum LLC answer due 5/31/2024; T-Mobile US, Inc. answer due 5/31/2024; T-Mobile USA, Inc. answer due 5/31/2024. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 5/2/2024. (CH)
April 30, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 UNOPPOSED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer , MOVE, OR OTHERWISE RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT by Sprint LLC, Sprint Solutions LLC, Sprint Spectrum LLC, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Melissa)
April 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 13 CONSOLIDATION ORDER- It is ORDERED that case 2:24CV196 and 2:24CV197 be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00195. All parties are instructed to fileany future filings in the LEAD CASE 2:24CV195. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 04/29/2024. (KLC)
April 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 5/29/2024 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap.. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 4/17/2024. (BS) Modified on 4/17/2024 (CH).
April 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings: Scheduling/Case Management Conference set for 5/29/2024 at 10:00 AM before District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (CH)
April 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Smart RF Inc.. AT&T Mobility LLC served on 3/26/2024. (Fair, Andrea)
April 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re AT&T Mobility LLC.(Dacus, Deron)
April 2, 2024 Opinion or Order Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for AT&T Mobility LLC to 5/31/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.(CH)
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Louis Levenson on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Levenson, Nathan)
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan P Griffin on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Griffin, Ryan)
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Hart Rastegar on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Rastegar, Jonathan)
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick Joseph Conroy on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Conroy, Patrick)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to AT&T Mobility LLC. (ch, )
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Smart RF Inc. (Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Smart RF Inc.. (Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against AT&T Mobility LLC ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10037516.), filed by Smart RF Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - XILINX LogiCORE IP Digital Pre-Distortion v5.0 Product Specification, #3 Exhibit B - NanoSemis Value Proposition and Competitive Advantages, #4 Exhibit C - Elevating 4G and 5G Infrastructure Connectivity)(Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
March 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smart RF Inc. v. AT&T Mobility LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Smart RF Inc.
Represented By: Andrea Leigh Fair
Represented By: Patrick Joseph Conroy
Represented By: Jonathan Hart Rastegar
Represented By: Nathan Louis Levenson
Represented By: Ryan P Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: AT&T Mobility LLC
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Represented By: Deron R Dacus
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint LLC
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Solutions LLC
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Spectrum LLC
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?