Smart RF Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Smart RF Inc.
Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc., Sprint LLC, Sprint Solutions LLC and Sprint Spectrum LLC
Case Number: 2:2024cv00197
Filed: March 19, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Rodney Gilstrap
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 29, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 17 CONSOLIDATION ORDER- It is ORDERED that case 2:24CV196 and 2:24CV197 be CONSOLIDATED for all pretrial issues with the LEAD CASE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00195. All parties are instructed to fileany future filings in the LEAD CASE 2:24CV195. Signed by District Judge Rodney Gilstrap on 04/29/2024. (KLC)
March 25, 2024 Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Smart RF Inc.. Sprint LLC served on 3/20/2024; T-Mobile US, Inc. served on 3/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Executed Summons - Sprint LLC)(Fair, Andrea)
March 25, 2024 Filing 15 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Smart RF Inc.. Sprint Solutions LLC served on 3/20/2024; Sprint Spectrum LLC served on 3/20/2024; T-Mobile USA, Inc. served on 3/20/2024. (Attachments: #1 Executed Summons - Sprint Spectrum LLC, #2 Executed Summons - Sprint Solutions LLC)(Fair, Andrea)
March 22, 2024 Filing 14 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Nathan Louis Levenson on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Levenson, Nathan)
March 22, 2024 Filing 13 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Ryan P Griffin on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Griffin, Ryan)
March 22, 2024 Filing 12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jonathan Hart Rastegar on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Rastegar, Jonathan)
March 22, 2024 Filing 11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Patrick Joseph Conroy on behalf of Smart RF Inc. (Conroy, Patrick)
March 22, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Solutions LLC to 5/25/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
March 22, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint LLC to 5/25/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
March 22, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for Sprint Spectrum LLC to 5/25/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
March 22, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile US, Inc. to 5/25/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
March 22, 2024 Defendant's Unopposed FIRST Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint is granted pursuant to Local Rule CV-12 for T-Mobile USA, Inc. to 5/25/2024. 45 Days Granted for Deadline Extension.( ch, )
March 21, 2024 Filing 10 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile USA, Inc..( Smith, Melissa)
March 21, 2024 Filing 9 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re T-Mobile US, Inc..( Smith, Melissa)
March 21, 2024 Filing 8 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sprint Spectrum LLC.( Smith, Melissa)
March 21, 2024 Filing 7 Defendant's Unopposed First Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sprint Solutions LLC.( Smith, Melissa)
March 21, 2024 Filing 6 Defendant's Unopposed Firs Application for Extension of Time to Answer Complaint re Sprint LLC.( Smith, Melissa)
March 19, 2024 Filing 5 SUMMONS Issued as to Sprint LLC, Sprint Solutions LLC, Sprint Spectrum LLC, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Additional Attachment(s), #2 Additional Attachment(s), #3 Additional Attachment(s), #4 Additional Attachment(s))(ch, )
March 19, 2024 Filing 4 Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1(a)(1) Disclosure Statement filed by Smart RF Inc. (Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Filing 3 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Smart RF Inc.. (Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Filing 2 Notice of Filing of Patent/Trademark Form (AO 120). AO 120 mailed to the Director of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. (Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sprint LLC, Sprint Solutions LLC, Sprint Spectrum LLC, T-Mobile US, Inc., T-Mobile USA, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXEDC-10037640.), filed by Smart RF Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - XILINX LogiCORE IP Digital Pre-Distortion v5.0 Product Specification, #3 Exhibit B - NanoSemis Value Proposition and Competitive Advantages, #4 Exhibit C - Elevating 4G and 5G Infrastructure Connectivity)(Fair, Andrea)
March 19, 2024 In accordance with the provisions of 28 USC Section 636(c), you are hereby notified that a U.S. Magistrate Judge of this district court is available to conduct any or all proceedings in this case including a jury or non-jury trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. The form #Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge is available on our website. All signed consent forms, excluding pro se parties, should be filed electronically using the event Notice Regarding Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge. (ch, )
March 19, 2024 Case assigned to District Judge Rodney Gilstrap. (ch, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smart RF Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Smart RF Inc.
Represented By: Andrea Leigh Fair
Represented By: Patrick Joseph Conroy
Represented By: Jonathan Hart Rastegar
Represented By: Nathan Louis Levenson
Represented By: Ryan P Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-Mobile US, Inc.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint LLC
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Solutions LLC
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sprint Spectrum LLC
Represented By: Melissa Richards Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?