Chanthakoummane v. Director TDCJ-CID

Petitioner: Kosoul Chanthakoummane
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Case Number: 4:2013cv00067
Filed: February 5, 2013
Court: Texas Eastern District Court
Office: Sherman Office
County: Anderson
Presiding Judge: Leonard Davis
Nature of Suit: Death Penalty - Habeas Corpus
Cause of Action: 28:2254ex Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Capital)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 20, 2015 34 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL. ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. It is finally ORDERED that all motions not previously ruled on are DENIED. Signed by Judge Leonard Davis on 3/20/2015. (kls, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Chanthakoummane v. Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kosoul Chanthakoummane
Represented By: Carlo D'Angelo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director TDCJ-CID
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.